Research Resources
Research has been essential to provide an empirical basis for enhancements to the eldercaring coordination process throughout its development to:
Meet the needs of the elder, the family, and the court
Foster promising practices
Provide the best service possible
Enhance the Eldercaring Coordinator Training
For five years, monthly meetings were conducted with pilot sites, as well as ECs, in order to obtain input on a regular basis. Meanwhile, independent research on eldercaring coordination took place through Virginia Tech University, led by Pamela Teaster, Ph.D., Director of the Center of Gerontology, and Megan Dolbin-MacNab, Director of the Doctoral Program of Marriage and Family Therapy. Analysis conducted was provided to the pilot sites and ECs to inform improvements to the eldercaring coordination process throughout its implementation.
Information used to monitor the development of eldercaring coordination included:
Identification of risks and safety issues, including instances of reports of elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation;
Reduction in hearings before the court in cases referred to eldercaring coordination;
Increased use of community resources (e.g. physicians, attorneys, guardians, elder mediators, health care, mental health and psychosocial professionals, aging life care professionals, financial experts, etc.) to assist the elder and family;
Review of Eldercaring Coordination Surveys by Independent Research Team
An Eldercaring Coordination Program design that can be easily replicated statewide, nationally and internationally by other circuits, districts and jurisdictions
Eldercaring Coordinator Training progress
Indicators of Success have been identified by participants as:
Elder well-being (most prominent)
Reducing family conflict
Avoiding/reducing litigation: fewer hearings; shorter hearings; more focused hearings
Making decisions on care issues and matters unrelated to the law
Reaching agreements related to the general welfare of the elder
The following risks have been identified through eldercaring coordination:
Elder Neglect
Elder Vulnerable – Mental Problems
Unsafe Environment for Elder
Coercion
Elder Vulnerable – Physical Problems
Deception
Exploitation
Domestic Violence
Extortion
Elder Psychological Abuse
Elder Physical Abuse
Violence Between Participants
Fraud
Kidnapping
“Eldercaring coordination saved that man’s life!”
– Florida Judge
Post Process Data
Success of eldercaring coordination reported by judiciary
100% of Judges reporting indicated that eldercaring coordination was “very effective” overall as an intervention for high conflict families
81% of Court Administrators/Magistrates reporting indicated that eldercaring coordination was “very effective” (18% reported it was “somewhat effective”)